Wikipedia: James Purnell #2

…and a few minutes later, he’s back to James’ profile, with more info. He provides context for the post, but it reads like total nonsense, and surely only he and a few other Labour Party nerds would understand what it all means?

But the parliamentary connections are given away by his description of his edit Added correct events from court case as found in latest Dod’s Parliamentary Companion – where else but the office of an MP would you be more likely to find such a reference book?


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: